Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/10216/129122| Author(s): | Miguens, Sofia |
| Title: | What is the difference between Hamlet and me? Fiction, metaphysics and the nature of our moral thinking |
| Issue Date: | 2020 |
| Abstract: | Starting from the main current views this essay considers whether entities (e.g. characters) in fiction should be viewed as abstract objects. I highlight some features of the historical concrete-abstract distinction, and, in particular, how entities in fiction are involved in our moral thinking. Here I call attention to an aspect of moral thinking orthogonal to that which currently divides moral realists and moral fictionalists and sketch an argument for fictional entities being in a specific sense concrete. Although the article does not, per se, call into question the approach to metaphysics according to which fictional characters are not like concrete objects, it exemplifies how a different perspective on the job of metaphysics (e.g. Cora Diamond's realistic spirit) gives the problem of fictional entities a radically different shape. |
| DOI: | 10.1007/978-3-030-38242-1_12 |
| URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/10216/129122 |
| Source: | Abstract objects: for and against |
| Document Type: | Capítulo ou Parte de Livro |
| Rights: | restrictedAccess |
| Appears in Collections: | FLUP - Capítulo ou Parte de Livro |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 417397.pdf Restricted Access | 3.94 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.