Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10216/129122
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorMiguens, Sofia
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-14T23:09:16Z-
dc.date.available2020-09-14T23:09:16Z-
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.othersigarra:417397
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10216/129122-
dc.description.abstractStarting from the main current views this essay considers whether entities (e.g. characters) in fiction should be viewed as abstract objects. I highlight some features of the historical concrete-abstract distinction, and, in particular, how entities in fiction are involved in our moral thinking. Here I call attention to an aspect of moral thinking orthogonal to that which currently divides moral realists and moral fictionalists and sketch an argument for fictional entities being in a specific sense concrete. Although the article does not, per se, call into question the approach to metaphysics according to which fictional characters are not like concrete objects, it exemplifies how a different perspective on the job of metaphysics (e.g. Cora Diamond's realistic spirit) gives the problem of fictional entities a radically different shape.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofAbstract objects: for and against
dc.rightsrestrictedAccess
dc.titleWhat is the difference between Hamlet and me? Fiction, metaphysics and the nature of our moral thinking
dc.typeCapítulo ou Parte de Livro
dc.contributor.uportoFaculdade de Letras
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/978-3-030-38242-1_12
Appears in Collections:FLUP - Capítulo ou Parte de Livro

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
417397.pdf
  Restricted Access
3.94 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.