Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10216/94882
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorCharrua, A.
dc.creatorAvelino, A.
dc.creatorCruz, F.
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-11T21:54:45Z-
dc.date.available2022-09-11T21:54:45Z-
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.othersigarra:47398
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10216/94882-
dc.descriptionThe persisting interest around neurotoxins such as vanilloids and botulinum toxin (BoNT) derives from their marked effect on detrusor overactivity refractory to conventional antimuscarinic treatments. In addition, both are administered by intravesical route. This offers three potential advantages. First, intravesical therapy is an easy way to provide high concentrations of pharmacological agents in the bladder tissue without causing unsuitable levels in other organs. Second, drugs effective on the bladder, but inappropriate for systemic administration, can be safely used as it is the case of vanilloids and BoNT. Third, the effects of one single treatment might be extremely longlasting, contributing to render these therapies highly attractive to patients despite the fact that the reasons to the prolonged effect are still incompletely understood. Attractive as it may be, intravesical pharmacological therapy should still be considered as a second-line treatment in patients refractory to conventional oral antimuscarinic therapy or who do not tolerate its systemic side effects. However, the increasing off-label use of these neurotoxins justifies a reappraisal of their pharmacological properties.
dc.description.abstractThe persisting interest around neurotoxins such as vanilloids and botulinum toxin (BoNT) derives from their marked effect on detrusor overactivity refractory to conventional antimuscarinic treatments. In addition, both are administered by intravesical route. This offers three potential advantages. First, intravesical therapy is an easy way to provide high concentrations of pharmacological agents in the bladder tissue without causing unsuitable levels in other organs. Second, drugs effective on the bladder, but inappropriate for systemic administration, can be safely used as it is the case of vanilloids and BoNT. Third, the effects of one single treatment might be extremely longlasting, contributing to render these therapies highly attractive to patients despite the fact that the reasons to the prolonged effect are still incompletely understood. Attractive as it may be, intravesical pharmacological therapy should still be considered as a second-line treatment in patients refractory to conventional oral antimuscarinic therapy or who do not tolerate its systemic side effects. However, the increasing off-label use of these neurotoxins justifies a reappraisal of their pharmacological properties.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofUrinary Tract, Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology (202)
dc.rightsrestrictedAccess
dc.subjectCiências da Saúde, Outras ciências médicas
dc.subjectHealth sciences, Other medical sciences
dc.titleModulation of Urinary Bladder Innervation: TRPV1 and Botulinum Toxin A.
dc.typeCapítulo ou Parte de Livro
dc.contributor.uportoFaculdade de Ciências da Nutrição e Alimentação
dc.subject.fosCiências médicas e da saúde::Outras ciências médicas
dc.subject.fosMedical and Health sciences::Other medical sciences
Appears in Collections:FCNAUP - Capítulo ou Parte de Livro

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
47398.pdf
  Restricted Access
470.5 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.