Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10216/9137
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorShadd Maruna
dc.creatorLouise Porter
dc.creatorIrene Carvalho
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-06T19:45:47Z-
dc.date.available2019-02-06T19:45:47Z-
dc.date.issued2004
dc.identifier.issn0264-5505
dc.identifier.othersigarra:79243
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio-aberto.up.pt/handle/10216/9137-
dc.description.abstractThe notion of 'desistance' (or 'going straight') is becoming a moreprominent one in criminological discourse, and the Liverpool Desistance Study(LDS) aimed to provide a deeper understanding of this process from the perspectiveof the individuals taking this life path. However, the LDS was not intended toaddress how the research might be applied in practice. This article therefore brieflyoutlines the research and discusses some of the policy implications, in order toopen a debate with practitioners and others about the way that the research mightbe relevant to everyday practice with people who offend. The papers that followthis article were written in response to the challenge of applying the findings of theLDS in probation practice.
dc.language.isopor
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.titleThe Liverpool Desistance Study and probation practice: Opening the dialogue
dc.typeArtigo em Revista Científica Internacional
dc.contributor.uportoFaculdade de Medicina
Appears in Collections:FMUP - Artigo em Revista Científica Internacional

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
79243.pdf95.56 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons