Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10216/97665
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorRui Gonçalves
dc.creatorAlberto A. Pinto
dc.creatorFrancisco Calheiros
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-04T22:07:35Z-
dc.date.available2019-02-04T22:07:35Z-
dc.date.issued2008
dc.identifier.othersigarra:49138
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio-aberto.up.pt/handle/10216/97665-
dc.descriptionWe exploit ideas of nonlinear dynamics in a non-deterministic dynamical setting. Our object of study is the observed riverflow time series of the Portuguese Paiva river whose water is used for public supply. The Takens delay embedding of the daily riverflow time series revealed an intermittent dynamical behaviour due to precipitation occurrence. The laminar phase occurs in the absence of rainfall. The nearest neighbour method of prediction revealed good predictability in the laminar regime but we warn that this method is misleading in the presence of rain. The correlation integral curve analysis, Singular Value Decomposition and the Nearest Neighbour Method indicate that the laminar regime of flow is in a small neighbourhood of a one-dimensional affine subspace in the phase space. The Nearest Neighbour method attested also that in the laminar phase and for a data set of 53 years the information of the current runoff is by far the most relevant information to predict future runoff. However the information of the past two runoffs is important to correct non-linear effects of the riverflow as the MSE and MRE criteria results show. The results point out that the Nearest Neighbours method fails when used in the irregular phase because it does not predict precipitation occurrence.
dc.description.abstractWe exploit ideas of nonlinear dynamics in a non-deterministic dynamical setting. Our object of study is the observed riverflow time series of the Portuguese Paiva river whose water is used for public supply. The Takens delay embedding of the daily riverflow time series revealed an intermittent dynamical behaviour due to precipitation occurrence. The laminar phase occurs in the absence of rainfall. The nearest neighbour method of prediction revealed good predictability in the laminar regime but we warn that this method is misleading in the presence of rain. The correlation integral curve analysis, Singular Value Decomposition and the Nearest Neighbour Method indicate that the laminar regime of flow is in a small neighbourhood of a one-dimensional affine subspace in the phase space. The Nearest Neighbour method attested also that in the laminar phase and for a data set of 53 years the information of the current runoff is by far the most relevant information to predict future runoff. However the information of the past two runoffs is important to correct non-linear effects of the riverflow as the MSE and MRE criteria results show. The results point out that the Nearest Neighbours method fails when used in the irregular phase because it does not predict precipitation occurrence.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofDifferential Equations, Chaos and Variational Problems - Progress in Nonlinear Differential Equations and Their Applications, Volume 75, Springer.
dc.rightsrestrictedAccess
dc.subjectMatemática
dc.subjectMathematics
dc.titleNonlinear Prediction in Riverflow - The Paiva River Case
dc.typeCapítulo ou Parte de Livro
dc.contributor.uportoFaculdade de Ciências
dc.subject.fosCiências exactas e naturais::Matemática
dc.subject.fosNatural sciences::Mathematics
Appears in Collections:FCUP - Capítulo ou Parte de Livro

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
49138.pdf
  Restricted Access
331.22 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.