Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/10216/164371Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.creator | Faria, Domingos | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-12-20T00:16:29Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-12-20T00:16:29Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2024-03 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2069-0533 | |
| dc.identifier.other | sigarra:701006 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10216/164371 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | In this paper, we have two goals: Firstly, we intend to examine the most robust recent formulation of the problem of religious diversity or disagreement. We will argue that Sanford Goldberg's version is better than John Greco's. Secondly, we aim to examine different solutions and develop a new one based on Ernest Sosa's virtue epistemology as a response to the problem of religious diversity or disagreement. | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | |
| dc.rights | openAccess | |
| dc.title | The problem of religious diversity or disagreement: recent formulations and solutions | |
| dc.type | Artigo em Revista Científica Internacional | |
| dc.contributor.uporto | Faculdade de Letras | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.5840/logos-episteme20241511 | |
| Appears in Collections: | FLUP - Artigo em Revista Científica Internacional | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 701006.pdf | 207.44 kB | Adobe PDF | ![]() View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
