Alegoria de uma visão fazer-pensar da arquitectura, conhecimento, memória, desejo

Abstract

As a record of an assumed research experience that falls under diverse questions that have been imposing, not only during the academical years of the course, but, equally, at the dawn of the first years of practice, the dissertation project is resolved between thought, creation, knowledge and desire. Without putting under question the autonomy of the creation in architecture, is, however, necessary to deepen the knowledge supporting the other time, that precedes the time when drawing goes into oblivion. Trigger a way of thinking and a successive architecture vision flourish from the meeting of certain circumstances and from the record of the intersection between two movements separating from each other. The exhaustive reading of Juan Navarro Baldeweg's writings and also is body of work - architecture, painting, sculpture and installation art - spurred an opportunity of self-enrichment: therefore, his study and the participation of his interpretation are of the outmost relevance for the construction of a distant reflection. On the other hand, becomes insurgent this approach on the registration about the procedures taken in the different circumstances - school and profession - in ways of future starting point, as awareness of a procedure - artistic and disciplinary - self. It is certain that this last movement was only achievable by means of the activation of the first one. The first movement, obviously, is seen as a tool of aware autonomy, widely desired for a conscious design and, finally, of its operability. The contexts and the tools themselves are guided in a crescendo, which are a proof that even the school inexperience, consistently, can rise a knowledge that dethatches itself from the exclusive thing to general interests of the subject that boils down to the specific understanding of the phrase "what is architecture?". Resigned in its transitivity, the dissertation project presented comes, as an opening, participating in a place and tools specific to Architecture. In this regard, "what interest can I extract from this investigation?". Resuming transversal interests, in a personal tone that is the touchstone of a vision, once again, personal, a rise is given to a way of thinking that is of the common interest, as an illusion of a method to fulfil-conceive architecture.