Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10216/129164
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorMiguens, Sofia
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-06T20:10:53Z-
dc.date.available2022-09-06T20:10:53Z-
dc.date.issued2020-10
dc.identifier.issn0026-9662
dc.identifier.othersigarra:417976
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10216/129164-
dc.description.abstractHilary Putnam and Cora Diamond both wrote on Wittgenstein's Three Lectures on Religious Belief. They did it quite differently; my ultimate aim in this article is to explore this difference. Putnam's view of religion is largely a view of ethical life; I look thus into his writings on ethics and his proposals to face the relativist menace therein. Still, in his incursions into philosophy of religion, describing religious experience through authors such as Rosenzweig, Buber, or Levinas, Putnam deals with what Diamond calls, after Wittgenstein, "the gulfs between us." Such gulfs, and the threat of relativism they bring, need to be accounted for. With that purpose in mind I complement Putnam's reading of the Three Lectures with Diamond's own reading.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsrestrictedAccess
dc.subjectFilosofia
dc.subjectPhilosophy
dc.titleThe human face of naturalism: Putnam and Diamond on religious belief and the "Gulfs between us"
dc.typeArtigo em Revista Científica Internacional
dc.contributor.uportoFaculdade de Letras
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/monist/onaa013
Appears in Collections:FLUP - Artigo em Revista Científica Internacional

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
417976.pdf
  Restricted Access
158.09 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.