Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10216/116752
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorMatos, Gabriela
dc.creatorBrito, Ana Maria
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-06T21:10:40Z-
dc.date.available2022-09-06T21:10:40Z-
dc.date.issued2018-09
dc.identifier.othersigarra:290403
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10216/116752-
dc.description.abstractIn this paper we analyse parallelisms and differences between free relatives, true embedded wh interrogatives, and improper embedded wh interrogatives. While free relatives are DPs which contain a CP, embedded wh interrogatives, both true and improper interrogatives, are CPs. In the last years and in the framework of the Minimalist Program, this different categorial nature has been deduced from formal labelling conditions, mainly related to the nature of head or maximal projection of the moved wh constituent. In this paper, while not rejecting the importance of the difference between head and maximal projection of the wh constituent, we show that the DP or CP nature of the embedded constituent and its [+int] or [+decl] status must be sanctioned by the selection requirements of the matrix predicate.
dc.language.isopor
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.subjectCiências da linguagem
dc.subjectlanguage sciences
dc.titleRelativas livres e interrogativas parciais: paralelos e diferenças
dc.typeArtigo em Revista Científica Nacional
dc.contributor.uportoFaculdade de Letras
dc.identifier.doi10.26334/2183-9077/rapln4ano2018a38
Appears in Collections:FLUP - Artigo em Revista Científica Nacional

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
290403.pdf771.1 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.