Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/10216/104484Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.creator | F. Xavier Malcata | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-09-12T06:42:56Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2022-09-12T06:42:56Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1541-4329 | |
| dc.identifier.other | sigarra:96940 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10216/104484 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | If asked for practical advice to gain students' attention and en-thusiasm, I would refer to basically 5 keywords (ROSIS, for short): (i) Reality-let classes develop as rationalizations of students' own past experiences, thus enhancing applicability; (ii) Originality- go one step beyond published texts, and incorporate unique examples that make a difference; (iii) Suspense-build lectures as detective plots that gradually attract interest, until the climax of conclusions is attained; (iv) Integration-tie scattered ideas from disparate fields of knowledge through fundamental concepts, side by side with a synthesis methodology; and (v) Simplicity-avoid the temptation of hiding behind complex representations-outline instead what really matters. As part of systematic implementation of an ever-improving teaching philosophy, I have, over the years, tried to: (i) prepare classes carefully and rationally; (ii) incorporate students' opinions and suggestions into my own performance, through a coordinated and iterative feedback process; (iii) make lectures and discussion classes as simple and intelligible as possible; (iv) highlight main points in the classroom; (v) provide individual homework problems to stress details; (vi) emphasize relationships of the subject to other fields of practical interest; (vii) be available for individual students or small groups for clarification of important or difficult-to-understand points; (viii) foster critical thinking skills, so students learn to develop reasoning methods rather than problem-solving routines; and last (but certainly not least), (ix) be fair in the evaluation, by providing comprehensive exams with a balance of conceptual and analytical questions. | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | |
| dc.rights | restrictedAccess | |
| dc.subject | Ciências da engenharia e tecnologias | |
| dc.subject | Engineering and technology | |
| dc.title | Some thoughts from a food science and technology educator | |
| dc.type | Artigo em Revista Científica Internacional | |
| dc.contributor.uporto | Faculdade de Engenharia | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/1541-4329.12052 | |
| dc.subject.fos | Ciências da engenharia e tecnologias | |
| dc.subject.fos | Engineering and technology | |
| Appears in Collections: | FEUP - Artigo em Revista Científica Internacional | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 96940.1.pdf | Post-Print version | 294.34 kB | Adobe PDF | ![]() View/Open |
| 96940.pdf Restricted Access | Artigo original publicado | 206.41 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
