Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10216/167145
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorRoland B. van den Berg
dc.creatorEwelina Korczowska
dc.creatorMónica Santos
dc.creatorMaria Francisca Portilha-Cunha
dc.creatorAna R. L. Ribeiro
dc.creatorLucie Bláhová
dc.creatorBlaha, Ludek
dc.creatorClaudia Vom Eyser
dc.creatorJochen Tuerk
dc.creatorRichard C. J. M. van Rossen
dc.creatorErik B. Wilms
dc.creatorMirjam Crul
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-03T00:21:19Z-
dc.date.available2026-02-03T00:21:19Z-
dc.date.issued2025
dc.identifier.issn1942-7603
dc.identifier.othersigarra:729194
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10216/167145-
dc.description.abstractWorkplace monitoring of hazardous medicinal products (HMPs) using surface wipe sampling is becoming common practice in many European hospitals and pharmacies. However, no independent quality control is available to validate wiping procedures and analytical methods. This study aimed to conduct a Europe-wide interlaboratory comparison (ILC) program to independently and blindly assess laboratory performance and variability in HMP detection. Four European laboratories participated in the study. Six HMPs-cyclophosphamide, etoposide, gemcitabine, ifosfamide, methotrexate, and paclitaxel-were prepared at four concentrations (5000, 2000, 200, and 20 ng/mL) and applied to a 400-cm2 stainless-steel surface, then wiped by the coordinating body according to each laboratory's protocol. Wipe samples were distributed to individual laboratories, where blind analyses were conducted. Target criteria for accuracy and recovery were set at 70%-130% and 50%-130%, respectively. Of the 80 samples, 69 (86%) met accuracy targets, and 70 (88%) met recovery targets. Accuracy was often overestimated for the lowest concentrations of cyclophosphamide, etoposide, methotrexate, and paclitaxel by Laboratory A. Laboratory D showed low accuracy for paclitaxel at three lower concentrations. Among the 10 samples that did not meet recovery targets, all were below 50% and involved etoposide and paclitaxel. This ILC program demonstrates a viable method for evaluating laboratory performance in HMP detection, offering an external validation mechanism for surface wipe sampling methods. A future goal is to establish a global ILC program with a designated coordinating body for managing it effectively.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT - Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia/Programa de Financiamento Plurianual de Unidades de I&D/UIDB/00511/2020_UIDP/00511/2020/Financiamento Plurianual 2020-2023 da Unidade de I&D LEPABE - Laboratório de Engenharia de Processos, Ambiente, Biotecnologia e Energia/LEPABE
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT - Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia/Programa de Financiamento Plurianual de Unidades de I&D/UIDB/50020/2020_UIDP/50020/2020/Financiamento Plurianual 2020-2023 para a Unidade LA LSRE-LCM Laboratório de Processos de Separação e Reacção - Laboratório de Catálise e Materiais/LA LSRE-LCM
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT - Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia/Programa de Financiamento Plurianual de Unidades de I&D/LA/P/0045/2020/ALiCE - Laboratório Associado em Engenharia Química/ALiCE
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.titleSurface Wipe Sampling of Hazardous Medicinal Products: A European Interlaboratory Comparison Study
dc.typeArtigo em Revista Científica Internacional
dc.contributor.uportoFaculdade de Engenharia
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/dta.3902
dc.identifier.authenticusP-018-SW5
Appears in Collections:FEUP - Artigo em Revista Científica Internacional

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
729194.pdf4.47 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.