Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10216/165745
Author(s): Connolly, SJ
Sharma, M
Cohen, AT
Demchuk, AM
Czlonkowska, A
Lindgren, AG
Molina, CA
Bereczki, D
Toni, D
Seiffge, DJ
Tanne, D
Sandset, EC
Tsivgoulis, G
Christensen, H
Beyer Westendorf, J
Coutinho, JM
Crowther, M
Verhamme, P
Amarenco, P
Roine, RO
Mikulik, R
Lemmens, R
Veltkamp, R
Middeldorp, S
Robinson, TG
Milling, TJ
Tedim Cruz, V
Lang, W
Himmelmann, A
Ladenvall, P
Knutsson, M
Ekholm, E
Law, A
Taylor, A
Karyakina, T
Xu, LZ
Tsiplova, K
Poli, S
Kallmuenzer, B
Gumbinger, C
Shoamanesh, A
Title: Andexanet for Factor Xa Inhibitor-Associated Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage
Publisher: Massachusetts Medical Society
Issue Date: 2024
Abstract: "Background: Patients with acute intracerebral hemorrhage who are receiving factor Xa inhibitors have a risk of hematoma expansion. The effect of andexanet alfa, an agent that reverses the effects of factor Xa inhibitors, on hematoma volume expansion has not been well studied. Methods: We randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, patients who had taken factor Xa inhibitors within 15 hours before having an acute intracerebral hemorrhage to receive andexanet or usual care. The primary end point was hemostatic efficacy, defined by expansion of the hematoma volume by 35% or less at 12 hours after baseline, an increase in the score on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale of less than 7 points (scores range from 0 to 42, with higher scores indicating worse neurologic deficit) at 12 hours, and no receipt of rescue therapy between 3 hours and 12 hours. Safety end points were thrombotic events and death. Results: A total of 263 patients were assigned to receive andexanet, and 267 to receive usual care. Efficacy was assessed in an interim analysis that included 452 patients, and safety was analyzed in all 530 enrolled patients. Atrial fibrillation was the most common indication for factor Xa inhibitors. Of the patients receiving usual care, 85.5% received prothrombin complex concentrate. Hemostatic efficacy was achieved in 150 of 224 patients (67.0%) receiving andexanet and in 121 of 228 (53.1%) receiving usual care (adjusted difference, 13.4 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.6 to 22.2; P = 0.003). The median reduction from baseline to the 1-to-2-hour nadir in anti-factor Xa activity was 94.5% with andexanet and 26.9% with usual care (P<0.001). Thrombotic events occurred in 27 of 263 patients (10.3%) receiving andexanet and in 15 of 267 (5.6%) receiving usual care (difference, 4.6 percentage points; 95% CI, 0.1 to 9.2; P = 0.048); ischemic stroke occurred in 17 patients (6.5%) and 4 patients (1.5%), respectively. There were no appreciable differences between the groups in the score on the modified Rankin scale or in death within 30 days. Conclusions: Among patients with intracerebral hemorrhage who were receiving factor Xa inhibitors, andexanet resulted in better control of hematoma expansion than usual care but was associated with thrombotic events, including ischemic stroke. (Funded by Alexion AstraZeneca Rare Disease and others; ANNEXA-I ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03661528.)."
DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa2313040
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/10216/165745
Source: N Engl J Med. 2024 May 16;390(19):1745-1755. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2313040.
Document Type: Artigo em Revista Científica Internacional
Rights: restrictedAccess
Appears in Collections:ISPUP - Artigo em Revista Científica Internacional

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
connolly2024.pdf
  Restricted Access
672.4 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.