Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/10216/162438Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.creator | Andias, R | - |
| dc.creator | Martins, AI | - |
| dc.creator | Pais, J | - |
| dc.creator | Cruz, VT | - |
| dc.creator | Silva, AG | - |
| dc.creator | Rocha, NP | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-11-04T16:22:56Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-11-04T16:22:56Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2055-2076 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10216/162438 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | "Background: Cognitive assessment and the early detection of cognitive impairments have been enhanced by the use of remote digital solutions. The Brain on Track® is one of these digital solutions used in clinical practice for online screening and monitoring of cognitive functioning. Objectives: This study aimed to explore the validity and reliability of the Brain on Track® computerized test on a tablet device in adults. Methods: A community sample of 54 young adults, 51 middle-aged adults, and 50 older adults were invited to attend in two assessment sessions. The first session included data collection on sociodemographic data, user digital literacy, Brain on Track® on the computer and on the tablet device, and usability from the user and moderator perspective. The second session included the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Questionnaire (MoCA) and a second completion of the Brain on Track® on tablet to assess the criterion validity and test-retest reliability. Hypothesis testing was used to assess construct validity. Results: A weak to moderate correlation was found between the Brain on Track® tablet score and the MoCA. The ICC was 0.72, 0.84, and 0.79, and Cronbach's alpha was 0.84, 0.83, and 0.89 in young adults, middle-aged adults, and older adults, respectively. Conclusions: This study suggested that the Brain on Track® administered using a tablet device has criterion validity, particularly in middle-aged and older adults, and internal consistency and test-retest reliability in adults of any age group." | pt_PT |
| dc.description.sponsorship | The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by Portuguese Recovery and Resilience Plan (PRR) and by the NextGenerationEU European Funds, through the “Agendas para a Inovação Empresarial” incentive system, under project HfPT—Health from Portugal (02/C05-i01.01/2022.PC644937233-00000047). | pt_PT |
| dc.language.iso | eng | pt_PT |
| dc.publisher | SAGE Publications | pt_PT |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Digit Health. 2024 Oct 18;10:20552076241287371. doi: 10.1177/20552076241287371. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec. | - |
| dc.rights | openAccess | pt_PT |
| dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | - |
| dc.title | Validity and reliability of a digital solution for cognitive assessment: The Brain on Track® | pt_PT |
| dc.type | Artigo em Revista Científica Internacional | pt_PT |
| dc.contributor.uporto | Instituto de Saúde Pública | pt_PT |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1177/20552076241287371 | - |
| dc.relation.publisherversion | https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/20552076241287371 | - |
| Appears in Collections: | ISPUP - Artigo em Revista Científica Internacional | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| andias2024.pdf | 321.97 kB | Adobe PDF | ![]() View/Open |
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
