Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo:
https://hdl.handle.net/10216/160601Registo completo
| Campo DC | Valor | Idioma |
|---|---|---|
| dc.creator | Oliveira, M | |
| dc.creator | Peleteiro, B | |
| dc.creator | Lunet, N | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-08-08T10:36:25Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-08-08T10:36:25Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2014 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1101-1262 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1464-360X | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10216/160601 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Background: Understanding the patterns of cervical cytology use in preventive care may provide useful information for an efficient transition from opportunistic screening to organized programmes. We aimed to identify the determinants of non-use and underuse of cervical cytology in Portuguese women. Methods: As part of the fourth National Health Survey (2005/2006), 2191 women aged between 25 and 64 years were evaluated. The previous use of cervical cytology was classified as never or ever, and, among the latter, those having performed the latest cytology testing >5 years before were considered to underuse cervical cytology. We assessed the determinants of non-use and underuse through age-and education-adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Results: Overall, 23.5% of women had never used cervical cytology and 10.7% reported underuse. This prevalence increased with age and decreased with education and income. Compared with the national mean, the lowest risk of non-use and underuse was observed in Norte (non-use: OR = 0.31, 95% CI: 0.23-0.42; underuse: OR = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.40-0.91) and the highest in Alentejo (non-use: OR = 2.33, 95% CI: 1.78-3.06; underuse: OR = 2.37, 95% CI: 1.43-3.93). Women without a private health insurance (OR = 2.65, 95% CI: 1.29-5.47), who had no doctor appointments in the preceding 3 months (OR = 2.06, 95% CI: 1.22-3.48) and those who had never performed a mammography (OR = 17.78, 95% CI: 9.09-34.78) were more likely to have never performed a cervical cytology. Conclusion: This study shows inequalities in the use of cervical cancer screening in Portugal and provides useful information for a better allocation of resources for cancer screening. © 2013 The Author. | |
| dc.description.sponsorship | The authors thank the National Health Systems Observatory (Observatório Nacional de Saúde), National Institute of Health Dr. Ricardo Jorge (INSA), Ministry of Health and the National Institute of Statistics (INE) for providing the data (Ministério da Saúde, Instituto Nacional de Saúde Dr. Ricardo Jorge; IP, Departamento de Epidemiologia/Instituto Nacional de Estatística: Inquérito Nacional de Saúde 2005/2006). | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | |
| dc.publisher | Oxford University Press | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Eur J Public Health. 2014 Apr;24(2):253-8. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckt077. Epub 2013 Jun 20. | |
| dc.rights | openAccess | |
| dc.title | Cytology use for cervical cancer screening in Portugal: Results from the 2005/2006 National Health Survey | |
| dc.type | Artigo em Revista Científica Internacional | |
| dc.contributor.uporto | Instituto de Saúde Pública da Universidade do Porto | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1093/eurpub/ckt077 | |
| dc.relation.publisherversion | https://academic.oup.com/eurpub/article/24/2/253/449328?login=false | |
| Aparece nas coleções: | ISPUP - Artigo em Revista Científica Internacional | |
Ficheiros deste registo:
| Ficheiro | Descrição | Tamanho | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| oliveira2014.pdf | 267.05 kB | Adobe PDF | ![]() Ver/Abrir |
Todos os registos no repositório estão protegidos por leis de copyright, com todos os direitos reservados.
