Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10216/158359
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorPereira, MA-
dc.creatorVila-Viçosa, MJ-
dc.creatorCoelho, C-
dc.creatorSantos, C-
dc.creatorEsteves, F-
dc.creatorCruz, R-
dc.creatorGomes, L-
dc.creatorHenriques, D-
dc.creatorVala, H-
dc.creatorNóbrega, C-
dc.creatorMega, AC-
dc.creatorMelo, C-
dc.creatorMalva, M-
dc.creatorBraguez, J-
dc.creatorMateus, TL-
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-02T15:51:05Z-
dc.date.available2024-05-02T15:51:05Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.issn2076-2615-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10216/158359-
dc.description.abstractThe production of small ruminant autochthonous breeds in the Centre region of Portugal is practiced in a semi-extensive husbandry system, exposing animals to parasitic infections. The main objective of this study was to estimate the prevalence of lungworm infection and identify risk factors. Fecal samples of 203 goats and 208 sheep from 30 herds were collected per rectum and subjected to the modified Baermann test. The overall prevalence of infection was 57.7%, significantly higher in goats (95.6%) than in sheep (20.7%) (p < 0.001). According to the binary logistic regression model, sheep dewormed with albendazole, mebendazole plus closantel, or ivermectin plus clorsulon presented a risk of Protostrongylidae infection 29.702, 7.426, or 8.720 times higher, respectively, than those dewormed with eprinomectin. Additionally, the presence of gastrointestinal parasites was investigated in 307 fecal samples using Mini-FLOTAC®. The overall prevalence of infection was 86.3%, also significantly higher in goats (93.2%) than in sheep (79.9%) (p < 0.001). Strongyle-type eggs were the most frequently identified, both in sheep (69.8%) and goats (87.8%), followed by Eimeria oocysts (40.3% in sheep and 68.9% in goats). Considering the high prevalence and the burden of lungworm parasitic infection, it is urgent to determine its economic impact and the repercussions in animal health in the Centre region of Portugal to establish appropriate therapeutic guidelines.pt_PT
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia via funds to GHTM-UID/04413/2020 and LA-REAL—LA/P/0117/2020; CITAB UIDB/04033/2020, https://doi.org/10.54499; CERNAS UIDB/00681/2020; CISAS UIDB/05937/2020; UIDP/05937/2020; as well as through the Projeto de Ignição e Provas de Conceito INOVC+ (PIPC/003/2022_02) cofounded by Centro 2020, Portugal 2020 and EU through IPV.pt_PT
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.publisherMDPI pt_PT
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/6817 - DCRRNI ID/LA/P/0117/2020/PTpt_PT
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/6817 - DCRRNI ID/UIDB/00681/2020/PTpt_PT
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/6817 - DCRRNI ID/UIDB/05937/2020/PTpt_PT
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/6817 - DCRRNI ID/UIDP/05937/2020/PTpt_PT
dc.relation.ispartofAnimals (Basel). 2024 Apr 21;14(8):1241. doi: 10.3390/ani14081241.-
dc.rightsopenAccesspt_PT
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.titlePulmonary and Gastrointestinal Parasitic Infections in Small Ruminant Autochthonous Breeds from Centre Region of Portugal-A Cross Sectional Studypt_PT
dc.typeArtigo em Revista Científica Internacionalpt_PT
dc.contributor.uportoInstituto de Saúde Públicapt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/ani14081241-
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/14/8/1241-
Appears in Collections:ISPUP - Artigo em Revista Científica Internacional

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
pereira-a24.pdf2.98 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons