Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10216/154497
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorFarraia, MV
dc.creatorCavaleiro Rufo, J
dc.creatorPaciência, I
dc.creatorMendes, F
dc.creatorDelgado, L
dc.creatorMoreira, A
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-14T12:08:02Z-
dc.date.available2023-11-14T12:08:02Z-
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn2444-8664
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10216/154497-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Volatile organic compounds (VOC) are end products of human metabolism (normal and disease-associated) that can be mainly excreted in breath, urine, and feces. Therefore, VOC can be very useful as markers of diseases and helpful for clinicians since its sampling is noninvasive, inexpensive, and painless. Electronic noses, or eNoses, provide an easy and inexpensive way to analyze gas samples. Thus, this device may be used for diagnosis, monitoring or phenotyping diseases according to specific breathprints (breath profile). Objective: In this review, we summarize data showing the ability of eNose to be used as a noninvasive tool to improve diagnosis in clinical settings. Methods: A PRISMA-oriented search was performed in PubMed and Cochrane Library. Only studies performed in humans and published since 2000 were included. Results: A total of 48 original articles, 21 reviews, and 7 other documents were eligible and fully analyzed. The quality assessment of the selected studies was conducted according to the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy. Airway obstructive diseases were the most studied and Cyranose 320 was the most used eNose. Conclusions: Several case–control studies were performed to test this technology in diverse fields. More than a half of the selected studies showed good accuracy. However, there are some limitations regarding sampling methodology, analysis, reproducibility, and external validation that need to be standardized. Additionally, it is urgent to test this technology in intend-to-treat populations. Thus, it is possible to think in the contribution of VOC analysis by eNoses in a clinical setting.
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors gratefully acknowledge funding from Project NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000010—Health, Comfort and Energy in the Built Environment (HEBE), cofinanced by Programa Operacional Regional do Norte (NORTE2020), through Fundo Europeu de Desenvolvimento Regional (FEDER). The current work has been supported by the EXPOSE project, which is financed by FEDER/FNR and by Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (EXPOSE 02/SAICT/2016—Project no. 023222).
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherWolters Kluwer Health
dc.relation.ispartofPorto Biomed J. 2019 Jul 22;4(4):e42. doi: 10.1097/j.pbj.0000000000000042. eCollection 2019 Jul-Aug.
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.titleThe electronic nose technology in clinical diagnosis: A systematic review
dc.typeArtigo em Revista Científica Nacional
dc.contributor.uportoInstituto de Saúde Pública da Universidade do Porto
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/j.pbj.0000000000000042
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://journals.lww.com/pbj/fulltext/2019/08000/the_electronic_nose_technology_in_clinical.1.aspx
Appears in Collections:ISPUP - Artigo em Revista Científica Nacional

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
farraia-pbj-2019.pdf1.42 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons