Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10216/154324
Author(s): Gouveia, TIA
Alves, A
Santos, MSF
Title: Theoretical rejection of fifty-four antineoplastic drugs by different nanofiltration membranes
Publisher: Springer
Issue Date: 2023
Abstract: The rise of nanofiltration technologies holds great promise for creating more effective and affordable techniques aiming to remove undesirable pollutants from wastewaters. Despite nanofiltration's promising potential in removing antineoplastic drugs from liquid matrices, the limited information on this topic makes it important to estimate the rejection rates for a larger number of compounds, particularly the emerging ones, in order to preview the nanofiltration performance. Aiming to have preliminary estimations of the rejection rates of antineoplastic drugs by nanofiltration, 54 antineoplastic drugs were studied in 5 nanofiltration membranes (Desal 5DK, Desal HL, Trisep TS-80, NF270, and NF50), using a quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) model. While this methodology provides useful and reliable predictions of the rejections of compounds by nanofiltration, particularly for hydrophilic and neutral compounds, it is important to note that QSAR results should always be corroborated by experimental assays, as predictions were confirmed to have their limitations (especially for hydrophobic and charged compounds). Out of the 54 studied antineoplastic drugs, 29 were predicted to have a rejection that could go up to 100%, independent of the membrane used. Nonetheless, there were 2 antineoplastic drugs, fluorouracil and thiotepa, for which negligible removals were obtained (<21%). This study's findings may contribute (i) to the selection of the most appropriate nanofiltration membranes for removing antineoplastic drugs from wastewaters and (ii) to assist in the design of effective treatment approaches for their removal.
Subject: Antineoplastic drugs
Cytostatic drugs
Nanofiltration
Rejection rates
QSAR model
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-023-29830-w
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/10216/154324
Source: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Oct;30(48):106099-106111. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-29830-w. Epub 2023 Sep 19.
Related Information: info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/6817 - DCRRNI ID/UIDB/04750/2020/PT
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/6817 - DCRRNI ID/UIDB/00511/2020/PT
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/6817 - DCRRNI ID/UIDP/00511/2020/PT
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/POR_NORTE/SFRH/BD/147301/2019/PT
Document Type: Artigo em Revista Científica Internacional
Rights: openAccess
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Appears in Collections:ISPUP - Artigo em Revista Científica Internacional

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
gouveia-espri-2023.pdf996.2 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons