Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10216/154301
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorFialová, D
dc.creatorLaffon, B
dc.creatorMarinković, V
dc.creatorTasić, L
dc.creatorDoro, P
dc.creatorSόos, G
dc.creatorMota, J
dc.creatorDogan, S
dc.creatorBrkić, J
dc.creatorTeixeira, JP
dc.creatorValdiglesias, V
dc.creatorCosta, S
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-14T11:30:20Z-
dc.date.available2023-11-14T11:30:20Z-
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn0031-6970
dc.identifier.issn1432-1041
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10216/154301-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction The importance of rational drug therapy is increasing with the aging of the population. Since one of the main reasons for inappropriate drug prescribing is also the “age-blind” approach, which results in ageist practices, this narrative literature review focuses on the description of the main barriers related to insufficient individualization of drug regimens associated with such age-blind approaches. Methodology A narrative literature review using the PubMed, WoS, Embase, and Scopus databases was conducted by the EU COST Action IS1402. Experts in different scientific fields from six countries (the Czech Republic, Spain, Portugal, Hungary, Serbia, and Turkey) worked in four specific areas: (1) underrepresentation of older adults in clinical trials and clinical and ethical consequences; (2) insufficient consideration of age-related changes and geriatric frailty in the evaluation of the therapeutic value of drugs; (3) frequent prescribing of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs); and (4) frequent underuse of highly beneficial nonpharmacological strategies (e.g., exercise). Results Older patients are underrepresented in clinical trials. Therefore, rigorous observational geriatric research is needed in order to obtain evidence on the real efficacy and safety of frequently used drugs, and e.g. developed geriatric scales and frailty indexes for claims databases should help to stimulate such research. The use of PIMs, unfortunately, is still highly prevalent in Europe: 22.6% in community-dwelling older patients and 49.0% in institutionalized older adults. Specific tests to detect the majority of age-related pharmacological changes are usually not available in everyday clinical practice, which limits the estimation of drug risks and possibilities to individualize drug therapy in geriatric patients before drug prescription. Moreover, the role of some nonpharmacological strategies is highly underestimated in older adults in contrast to frequent use of polypharmacy. Among nonpharmacological strategies, particularly physical exercise was highly effective in reducing functional decline, frailty, and the risk of falls in the majority of clinical studies. Conclusion Several regulatory and clinical barriers contribute to insufficient knowledge on the therapeutic value of drugs in older patients, age-blind approach, and inappropriate prescribing. New clinical and observational research is needed, including data on comprehensive geriatric assessment and frailty, to document the real efficacy and safety of frequently used medications.
dc.description.sponsorshipWe thank the members of the WG1b group “Healthy clinical strategies for healthy ageing” of the EU COST Action IS 1402 (205-2018) “Ageism - a multi-national, interdisciplinary perspective”, the chairs of this EU COST prof. Liat Ayalon and prof. Clemens Toesch-Römer, and the research group “Ageing and Changes in the Therapeutic Value of Drugs in the AgeD” (Chair: Fialová D., PharmD, PhD, BCCP) under the scientific program PROGRESS Q42 at the Faculty of Pharmacy, Charles University, Czech Republic. We also acknowledge to all research teams participating in the EUROAGEISM H2020 project, Horizon 2020-MSCA-ITN-764632 (2017–2021). Grant support: The work has been supported by the EU COST Action IS1402 initiative “Ageism - a multi-national, interdisciplinary perspective” (2015–2018), the EUROAGEISM H2020 project no. 764632, Horizon 2020-MSCA-ITN -764632 (2017–2021), and by the scientific program PROGRESS Q42 at the Department of Social and Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Charles University, Czech Republic
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relation.ispartofEur J Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Apr;75(4):451-466. doi: 10.1007/s00228-018-2603-5. Epub 2019 Jan 4.
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleMedication use in older patients and age-blind approach: narrative literature review (insufficient evidence on the efficacy and safety of drugs in older age, frequent use of PIMs and polypharmacy, and underuse of highly beneficial nonpharmacological strategies)
dc.typeArtigo em Revista Científica Internacional
dc.contributor.uportoInstituto de Saúde Pública da Universidade do Porto
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00228-018-2603-5
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00228-018-2603-5
Appears in Collections:ISPUP - Artigo em Revista Científica Internacional

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
fiavola-ejcp-2019.pdf638.96 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons