Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: https://hdl.handle.net/10216/152454
Registo completo
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.creatorLinhares, D
dc.creatorFonseca, JA
dc.creatorRibeiro-da-Silva, M
dc.creatorConceição, F
dc.creatorSousa, A
dc.creatorSousa-Pinto, B
dc.creatorNeves, N
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-29T08:22:12Z-
dc.date.available2023-08-29T08:22:12Z-
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.issn1478-7547
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10216/152454-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Microdiscectomy is the most commonly performed spine surgery and the first transitioning for outpatient settings. However, this transition was never studied, in what comes to cost-utility assessment. Accordingly, this economic study aims to access the cost-effectiveness of outpatient lumbar microdiscectomy when compared with the inpatient procedure. Methods: This is a cost utility study, adopting the hospital perspective. Direct medical costs were retrieved from the assessment of 20 patients undergoing outpatient lumbar microdiscectomy and 20 undergoing inpatient lumbar microdiscectomy Quality-adjusted life-years were calculated from Oswestry Disability Index values (ODI). ODI was prospectively assessed in outpatients in pre and 3- and 6-month post-operative evaluations. Inpatient ODI data were estimated from a meta-analysis. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) calculated. Results: Outpatient procedure was cost-saving in all models tested. At 3-month assessment ICER ranged from €135,753 to €345,755/QALY, higher than the predefined threshold of €60,000/QALY gained. At 6-month costs were lower and utilities were higher in outpatient, overpowering the inpatient procedure. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that in 65% to 73% of simulations outpatient was the better option. The savings with outpatient were about 55% of inpatient values, with similar utility scores. No 30-day readmissions were recorded in either group. Conclusion: This is the first economic study on cost-effectiveness of outpatient lumbar microdiscectomy, showing a significant reduction in costs, with a similar clinical outcome, proving it cost-effective.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherBMC
dc.relation.ispartofCost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, vol.19(1):19
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectCost–Benefit Analysis
dc.subjectDiskectomy
dc.subjectEconomics
dc.subjectIntervertebral Disc Displacement
dc.subjectOutpatients
dc.subjectPatient Reported Outcome Measures
dc.titleCost effectiveness of outpatient lumbar discectomy
dc.typeArtigo em Revista Científica Internacional
dc.contributor.uportoInstituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12962-021-00272-w
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://resource-allocation.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12962-021-00272-w
Aparece nas coleções:I3S - Artigo em Revista Científica Internacional

Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro Descrição TamanhoFormato 
10.1186-s12962-021-00272-w.pdf2.29 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
Ver/Abrir


Este registo está protegido por Licença Creative Commons Creative Commons