Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo:
https://hdl.handle.net/10216/152454Registo completo
| Campo DC | Valor | Idioma |
|---|---|---|
| dc.creator | Linhares, D | |
| dc.creator | Fonseca, JA | |
| dc.creator | Ribeiro-da-Silva, M | |
| dc.creator | Conceição, F | |
| dc.creator | Sousa, A | |
| dc.creator | Sousa-Pinto, B | |
| dc.creator | Neves, N | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-08-29T08:22:12Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2023-08-29T08:22:12Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1478-7547 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10216/152454 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Background: Microdiscectomy is the most commonly performed spine surgery and the first transitioning for outpatient settings. However, this transition was never studied, in what comes to cost-utility assessment. Accordingly, this economic study aims to access the cost-effectiveness of outpatient lumbar microdiscectomy when compared with the inpatient procedure. Methods: This is a cost utility study, adopting the hospital perspective. Direct medical costs were retrieved from the assessment of 20 patients undergoing outpatient lumbar microdiscectomy and 20 undergoing inpatient lumbar microdiscectomy Quality-adjusted life-years were calculated from Oswestry Disability Index values (ODI). ODI was prospectively assessed in outpatients in pre and 3- and 6-month post-operative evaluations. Inpatient ODI data were estimated from a meta-analysis. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) calculated. Results: Outpatient procedure was cost-saving in all models tested. At 3-month assessment ICER ranged from €135,753 to €345,755/QALY, higher than the predefined threshold of €60,000/QALY gained. At 6-month costs were lower and utilities were higher in outpatient, overpowering the inpatient procedure. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that in 65% to 73% of simulations outpatient was the better option. The savings with outpatient were about 55% of inpatient values, with similar utility scores. No 30-day readmissions were recorded in either group. Conclusion: This is the first economic study on cost-effectiveness of outpatient lumbar microdiscectomy, showing a significant reduction in costs, with a similar clinical outcome, proving it cost-effective. | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | |
| dc.publisher | BMC | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, vol.19(1):19 | |
| dc.rights | openAccess | |
| dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | |
| dc.subject | Cost–Benefit Analysis | |
| dc.subject | Diskectomy | |
| dc.subject | Economics | |
| dc.subject | Intervertebral Disc Displacement | |
| dc.subject | Outpatients | |
| dc.subject | Patient Reported Outcome Measures | |
| dc.title | Cost effectiveness of outpatient lumbar discectomy | |
| dc.type | Artigo em Revista Científica Internacional | |
| dc.contributor.uporto | Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1186/s12962-021-00272-w | |
| dc.relation.publisherversion | https://resource-allocation.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12962-021-00272-w | |
| Aparece nas coleções: | I3S - Artigo em Revista Científica Internacional | |
Ficheiros deste registo:
| Ficheiro | Descrição | Tamanho | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.1186-s12962-021-00272-w.pdf | 2.29 MB | Adobe PDF | ![]() Ver/Abrir |
Este registo está protegido por Licença Creative Commons
