Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10216/151564
Author(s): Costa, R
Barata, C
Dias, H
Rodrigues, C
Santos, T
Mariani, I
Covi, B
Valente, EP
Lazzerini, M
Ćerimagić, A
Drandić, D
Kurbanović, M
Virginie, R
de La Rochebrochard, E
Löfgren, K
Miani, C
Batram-Zantvoort, S
Wandschneider, L
Lazzerini, M
Mariani, I
Morano, S
Chertok, I
Hefer, E
Artzi-Medvedik, R
Pumpure, E
Rezeberga, D
Jansone-Šantare, G
Jakovicka, D
Knoka, AR
Vilcāne, KP
Liepinaitienė, A
Kondrakova, A
Mizgaitienė, M
Juciūtė, S
Arendt, M
Tasch, B
Nedberg, IH
Kongslien, S
Vik, ES
Baranowska, B
Tataj-Puzyna, U
Węgrzynowska, M
Costa, R
Barata, C
Santos, T
Rodrigues, C
Dias, H
Otelea, MR
Radetić, J
Ružičić, J
Drglin, Z
Ponikvar, BM
Bohinec, A
Brigidi, S
Castañeda, LM
Elden, H
Sengpiel, V
Linden, K
Zaigham, M
De Labrusse, C
Abderhalden, A
Pfund, A
Thorn, H
Grylka, S
Gemperle, M
Mueller, A
Title: Regional differences in the quality of maternal and neonatal care during the COVID-19 pandemic in Portugal: Results from the IMAgiNE EURO study
Publisher: Wiley
Issue Date: 2022
Abstract: Objective: To compare women's perspectives on the quality of maternal and newborn care (QMNC) around the time of childbirth across Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics 2 (NUTS-II) regions in Portugal during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Women participating in the cross-sectional IMAgiNE EURO study who gave birth in Portugal from March 1, 2020, to October 28, 2021, completed a structured questionnaire with 40 key WHO standards-based quality measures. Four domains of QMNC were assessed: (1) provision of care; (2) experience of care; (3) availability of human and physical resources; and (4) reorganizational changes due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Frequencies for each quality measure within each QMNC domain were computed overall and by region. Results: Out of 1845 participants, one-third (33.7%) had a cesarean. Examples of high-quality care included: low frequencies of lack of early breastfeeding and rooming-in (8.0% and 7.7%, respectively) and informal payment (0.7%); adequate staff professionalism (94.6%); adequate room comfort and equipment (95.2%). However, substandard practices with large heterogeneity across regions were also reported. Among women who experienced labor, the percentage of instrumental vaginal births ranged from 22.3% in the Algarve to 33.5% in Center; among these, fundal pressure ranged from 34.8% in Lisbon to 66.7% in Center. Episiotomy was performed in 39.3% of noninstrumental vaginal births with variations between 31.8% in the North to 59.8% in Center. One in four women reported inadequate breastfeeding support (26.1%, ranging from 19.4% in Algarve to 31.5% in Lisbon). One in five reported no exclusive breastfeeding at discharge (22.1%; 19.5% in Lisbon to 28.2% in Algarve). Conclusion: Urgent actions are needed to harmonize QMNC and reduce inequities across regions in Portugal. © 2022 The Authors. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.
Subject: childbirth; COVID-19; IMAgiNE EURO; maternal care; newborn care; Portugal; quality of care; respectful maternity care
DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.14507
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/10216/151564
Source: Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2022 Dec;159 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):137-153. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.14507.
Related Information: info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/POR_NORTE/SFRH/BPD/117597/2016/PT
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/6817 - DCRRNI ID/UIDB/05380/2020/PT
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/6817 - DCRRNI ID/UIDB/04750/2020/PT
Document Type: Artigo em Revista Científica Internacional
Rights: openAccess
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Appears in Collections:ISPUP - Artigo em Revista Científica Internacional

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
costa-barata-ijgo-2022.pdf6.15 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons