Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10216/151502
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorRodrigues, B
dc.creatorEncantado, J
dc.creatorCarraça, E
dc.creatorSousa-Sá, E
dc.creatorLopes, L
dc.creatorCliff, D
dc.creatorMendes, R
dc.creatorSilva, MN
dc.creatorGodinho, C
dc.creatorSantos, R
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-02T09:06:32Z-
dc.date.available2023-08-02T09:06:32Z-
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10216/151502-
dc.description.abstractBackground Sleep, sedentary behaviour and physical activity are constituent parts of a 24h period and there are several questionnaires to measure these movement behaviours, the objective was to systematically review the literature on content and measurement properties of self- and proxy-reported questionnaires measuring movement behaviours in adults and older adults. Methods The databases PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO and SPORTDiscus were systematically searched until April 2021. Articles were included if: the questionnaires were design for adults and older adults; the sample size for validity studies had at least 50 participants; at least, both validity and test-retest reliability results of questionnaire that were developed specifically to measure the amount of sleep, sedentary behaviour or physical activity, or their combination were reported; and articles had to be written in English, Spanish, French, Portuguese, German, Italian or Chinese. Findings and conclusions Data extraction, results, studies’ quality, and risk of bias were evaluated using the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guidelines. Fifty-five articles were included in this review, describing 60 questionnaires. None of the questionnaires showed adequate criterion validity and adequate reliability, simultaneously; 68.3% showed adequate content validity. The risk of bias for criterion validity and reliability were very low in 72.2% and 23.6% of the studies, respectively. Existing questionnaires have insufficient measurement properties and frequent methodologic limitations, and none was developed considering the 24h movement behaviour paradigm. The lack of valid and reliable questionnaires assessing 24h movement behaviours in an integrated way, precludes accurate monitoring and surveillance systems of 24h movement behaviours. © 2022 Rodrigues et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology(FCT): Research Centre in Physical Activity, Health and Leisure[FCT/UIDB/00617/2020] and Laboratoryfor Integrative and Translational Research in Population Health [LA/P/0064/2020];RS [CEECIND/01069/2017]; LL [CEECIND/01089/2017]; BR[UI/BD/150675/2020] and by The National Physical Activity Promotion Program of the Directorate-General of Health (Portugal). The funding agencies played no role in the study design; the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; the writing of the report; and in the decision to submit the article for publication. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the views of the Directorate-General of Health.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherPublic Library of Science
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/POR_NORTE/UI/BD/150675/2020/PT
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/CEEC IND 2017/CEECIND/01089/2017/CP1411/CT0002/PT
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/CEEC IND 2017/CEECIND/01069/2017/CP1411/CT0001/PT
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/6817 - DCRRNI ID/UIDB/00617/2020/PT
dc.relation.ispartofPLoS One. 2022 Mar 11;17(3):e0265100. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265100. eCollection 2022.
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleQuestionnaires measuring movement behaviours in adults and older adults: Content description and measurement properties. A systematic review
dc.typeArtigo em Revista Científica Internacional
dc.contributor.uportoInstituto de Saúde Pública da Universidade do Porto
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0265100
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0265100
Appears in Collections:ISPUP - Artigo em Revista Científica Internacional

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
rodrigues-ploso-2022.pdf916.9 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons