Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10216/151470
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorBarbosa, A
dc.creatorWhiting, S
dc.creatorDing, D
dc.creatorBrito, J
dc.creatorMendes, R
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-02T08:38:29Z-
dc.date.available2023-08-02T08:38:29Z-
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.issn1101-1262
dc.identifier.issn1464-360X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10216/151470-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Economic evaluation of physical activity interventions has become an important area for policymaking considering the high costs attributable to physical inactivity. However, the evidence for such interventions targeting type 2 diabetes control is scarce. Therefore, the present study aimed to synthesize economic evaluation studies of physical activity interventions for type 2 diabetes management. Methods: A systematic review was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 statement (PROSPERO reference number CRD42021231021). An electronic search was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and NHS Economic Evaluation Database. Studies were eligible if they included: adults with type 2 diabetes; any physical activity intervention in the community settings; an experimental or quasi-experimental design; and a parameter of economic evaluation [cost analysis of interventions, cost-effectiveness analysis (including cost-utility analysis) and cost-benefit analysis] as an outcome. Results: Ten studies were included in this review: seven were randomized controlled trials and three were quasi-experimental studies. All studies included direct costs, and four also included indirect costs. Four studies demonstrated that physical activity interventions were cost-saving, six studies showed cost-effectiveness, and two studies reported cost-utility. The estimates varied considerably across the studies with different analytical and methodological approaches. Conclusion: Overall, this systematic review found that physical activity interventions are a worth investment for type 2 diabetes management. However, comparability across interventions was limited due to heterogeneity in interventions type, design and delivery, which may explain the differences in the economic measures. © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association.
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was funded by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology within the scope of projects UIDB/04750/2020 and LA/P/0064/2020. Ana Barbosa was supported by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology, grant number SFRH/BD/136702/2018.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherOxford University Press
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/POR_NORTE/SFRH/BD/136702/2018/PT
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/6817 - DCRRNI ID/UIDB/04750/2020/PT
dc.relation.ispartofEur J Public Health. 2022 Aug 26;32(Suppl 1):i56-i66. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckac074.
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleEconomic evaluation of physical activity interventions for type 2 diabetes management: a systematic review
dc.typeArtigo em Livro de Atas de Conferência Internacional
dc.contributor.uportoInstituto de Saúde Pública da Universidade do Porto
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/eurpub/ckac074
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://academic.oup.com/eurpub/article/32/Supplement_1/i56/6676130
Appears in Collections:ISPUP - Artigo em Livro de Atas de Conferência Internacional

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
barbosa-ejph-2022.pdf267.52 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons