Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/10216/151470Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.creator | Barbosa, A | |
| dc.creator | Whiting, S | |
| dc.creator | Ding, D | |
| dc.creator | Brito, J | |
| dc.creator | Mendes, R | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-08-02T08:38:29Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2023-08-02T08:38:29Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1101-1262 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1464-360X | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10216/151470 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Background: Economic evaluation of physical activity interventions has become an important area for policymaking considering the high costs attributable to physical inactivity. However, the evidence for such interventions targeting type 2 diabetes control is scarce. Therefore, the present study aimed to synthesize economic evaluation studies of physical activity interventions for type 2 diabetes management. Methods: A systematic review was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 statement (PROSPERO reference number CRD42021231021). An electronic search was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and NHS Economic Evaluation Database. Studies were eligible if they included: adults with type 2 diabetes; any physical activity intervention in the community settings; an experimental or quasi-experimental design; and a parameter of economic evaluation [cost analysis of interventions, cost-effectiveness analysis (including cost-utility analysis) and cost-benefit analysis] as an outcome. Results: Ten studies were included in this review: seven were randomized controlled trials and three were quasi-experimental studies. All studies included direct costs, and four also included indirect costs. Four studies demonstrated that physical activity interventions were cost-saving, six studies showed cost-effectiveness, and two studies reported cost-utility. The estimates varied considerably across the studies with different analytical and methodological approaches. Conclusion: Overall, this systematic review found that physical activity interventions are a worth investment for type 2 diabetes management. However, comparability across interventions was limited due to heterogeneity in interventions type, design and delivery, which may explain the differences in the economic measures. © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. | |
| dc.description.sponsorship | This work was funded by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology within the scope of projects UIDB/04750/2020 and LA/P/0064/2020. Ana Barbosa was supported by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology, grant number SFRH/BD/136702/2018. | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | |
| dc.publisher | Oxford University Press | |
| dc.relation | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/POR_NORTE/SFRH/BD/136702/2018/PT | |
| dc.relation | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/6817 - DCRRNI ID/UIDB/04750/2020/PT | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Eur J Public Health. 2022 Aug 26;32(Suppl 1):i56-i66. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckac074. | |
| dc.rights | openAccess | |
| dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | |
| dc.title | Economic evaluation of physical activity interventions for type 2 diabetes management: a systematic review | |
| dc.type | Artigo em Livro de Atas de Conferência Internacional | |
| dc.contributor.uporto | Instituto de Saúde Pública da Universidade do Porto | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1093/eurpub/ckac074 | |
| dc.relation.publisherversion | https://academic.oup.com/eurpub/article/32/Supplement_1/i56/6676130 | |
| Appears in Collections: | ISPUP - Artigo em Livro de Atas de Conferência Internacional | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| barbosa-ejph-2022.pdf | 267.52 kB | Adobe PDF | ![]() View/Open |
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
