Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10216/149598
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorGarrido, MM
dc.creatorMarta, JC
dc.creatorRibeiro, RM
dc.creatorPinheiro, LC
dc.creatorHoldenrieder, S
dc.creatorGuimarães, JT
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-23T14:24:12Z-
dc.date.available2023-05-23T14:24:12Z-
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.issn0258-851X
dc.identifier.issn1791-7549
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10216/149598-
dc.description.abstractBackground/Aim: Lack of interchangeability between prostate-specific antigen (PSA) assays could have a clinical impact. We compared PSA assays from different manufacturers and calibrations. Patients and Methods: A total of 233 men who underwent prostate biopsy (PSA: 2-10 ng/ml; Beckman Coulter Access® Hybritech® as reference) were enrolled. Total (tPSA) and free PSA (fPSA) were also measured using the Roche cobas® and the Abbott Architect® methods. Results: Roche tPSA values were ≈1% higher than Beckman, while Abbott values were ≈5% lower. Roche had the highest diagnostic sensitivity (92%) compared to Beckman Coulter (87%) and Abbott (85%). Roche fPSA was ≈3% lower and Abbott ≈17% higher than that of Beckman. For the percentage of fPSA, Roche had the highest sensitivity (98%). Conclusion: Roche cobas® and Beckman Coulter Access® Hybritech® tPSA were almost interchangeable. While the agreement was acceptable for tPSA, this did not happen with fPSA and greater efforts for harmonization are required.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherInternational Institute of Anticancer Research
dc.relation.ispartofIn Vivo. 2021 Nov-Dec;35(6):3431-3439
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectMethod comparison
dc.subjectprostate cancer
dc.subjecttotal PSA
dc.subjectfree PSA
dc.subjecthybritech calibration
dc.subjectWHO calibration
dc.titleComparison of Three Assays for Total and Free PSA Using Hybritech and WHO Calibrations
dc.typeArtigo em Revista Científica Internacional
dc.contributor.uportoInstituto de Saúde Pública da Universidade do Porto
dc.identifier.doi10.21873/invivo.12643
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://iv.iiarjournals.org/content/35/6/3431
Appears in Collections:ISPUP - Artigo em Revista Científica Internacional

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
garrido-iv-2021.pdf1.47 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons