Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10216/149576
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorde Silva, PG-
dc.creatorNascimento, MSJ-
dc.creatorSoares, RRG-
dc.creatorSousa, SIV-
dc.creatorMesquita, JR-
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-23T14:24:01Z-
dc.date.available2023-05-23T14:24:01Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.issn0048-9697-
dc.identifier.issn1879-1026-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10216/149576-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Although an increasing body of data reports the detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in air, this does not correlate to the presence of infectious viruses, thus not evaluating the risk for airborne COVID-19. Hence there is a marked knowledge gap that requires urgent attention. Therefore, in this systematic review, viability/stability of airborne SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV viruses is discussed. Methods: A systematic literature review was performed on PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science and Scopus to assess the stability and viability of SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 on air samples. Results and discussion: The initial search identified 27 articles. Following screening of titles and abstracts and removing duplicates, 11 articles were considered relevant. Temperatures ranging from 20 °C to 25 °C and relative humidity ranging from 40% to 50% were reported to have a protective effect on viral viability for airborne SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV. As no data is yet available on the conditions influencing viability for airborne SARS-CoV-2, and given the genetic similarity to SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV, one could extrapolate that the same conditions would apply. Nonetheless, the effect of these conditions seems to be residual considering the increasing number of cases in the south of USA, Brazil and India, where high temperatures and humidities have been observed. Conclusion: Higher temperatures and high relative humidity can have a modest effect on SARS-CoV-2 viability in the environment, as reported in previous studies to this date. However, these studies are experimental, and do not support the fact that the virus has efficiently spread in the tropical regions of the globe, with other transmission routes such as the contact and droplet ones probably being responsible for the majority of cases reported in these regions, along with other factors such as human mobility patterns and contact rates. Further studies are needed to investigate the extent of aerosol transmission of SARS-CoV-2 as this would have important implications for public health and infection-control policies.-
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was financially supported by Base Funding - UIDB/00511/2020 of the Laboratory for Process Engineering, Environment, Biotechnology and Energy – LEPABE - funded by national funds through the FCT/MCTES (PIDDAC). This work was also financed by RESEARCH4COVID program under projects SARSBLOODsafe (ref 021), Cdots Biosensing COVID19 (ref 041) and fta4COVID19 (ref 598) funded by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT); Sofia I.V. Sousa thanks FCT for the financial support of her work contract through the Scientific Employment Stimulus - Individual Call - CEECIND/02477/2017; Priscilla Gomes da Silva thanks FCT for the financial support of her PhD work (2020.07806.BD) contract through the DOCTORATES 4 COVID-19 program.-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/6817 - DCRRNI ID/UIDB/00511/2020/PT-
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/CEEC IND 2017/CEECIND/02477/2017/CP1399/CT0007/PT-
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/POR_NORTE/2020.07806.BD/PT-
dc.relation.ispartofSci Total Environ. 2021 Apr 10;764:142802-
dc.rightsopenAccess-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subjectAirborne-
dc.subjectCOVID-19-
dc.subjectEmerging diseases-
dc.subjectInfectious-
dc.subjectSARS-CoV-2-
dc.subjectViability-
dc.titleAirborne spread of infectious SARS-CoV-2: Moving forward using lessons from SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV-
dc.typeArtigo em Revista Científica Internacional-
dc.contributor.uportoInstituto de Saúde Pública da Universidade do Porto-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142802-
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969720363312?via%3Dihub-
Appears in Collections:ISPUP - Artigo em Revista Científica Internacional

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
de-silva-ste-2021.pdf621.87 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons