Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10216/149452
Author(s): Marques, SCS
Doetsch, J
Abate, G
Brødsgaard, A
Colombo, G
Cuttini, M
Pedersen, P
Barros, H
RECAP Preterm-WP6 QS Work Group
Title: Understanding participation in European cohort studies of preterm children: the views of parents, healthcare professionals and researchers
Publisher: BMC
Issue Date: 2021
Abstract: Background Retention of participants in cohort studies is a major challenge. A better understanding of all elements involved in participation and attrition phenomena in particular settings is needed to develop effective retention strategies. The study aimed to achieve an in-depth understanding of participant retention in longitudinal cohorts focusing on participants’ and researcher’s perspectives, across three diverse socio-geographic and cultural settings. Methods This study used a triangulation of multi-situated methods to collect data on cohort studies of children born with less than 32 weeks of gestation in Denmark, Italy and Portugal. It included focus groups and individual semi-driven interviewing with involved key actors (i.e. parents, staff, healthcare professionals, researchers) and a collaborative visual methodology. A purposive sample of 48 key actors (n = 13 in Denmark; n = 13 in Italy; n = 22 in Portugal) was collected. A triangulation of phenomenological thematic analysis with discourse analysis was applied. Cross-contextual and context-specific situational elements involved in participation and attrition phenomena in these child cohorts were identified at various levels and stages. Results Main findings included: situational challenges affecting potential and range of possibilities for implementation strategies (geopolitical environment, societal changes, research funding models); situational elements related to particular strategies acting as deterrents (postal questionnaires) and facilitators (multiple flexible strategies, reminders, regular interaction); main motivations to enrol and participate (altruism/solidarity and gratitude/sense of duty to reciprocate); main motivational deterrents to participate to follow-up waves (lack of bonding, insufficient feedback); entanglement of clinical and research follow-up as facilitator and deterrent. Conclusions The multi-situated approach used, addressing the interplay of the lived experience of individuals, was of most value to understand participation variability under different implemented strategies in-context. Cross-contextual and context-specific situational elements that have been influential factors towards participation and attrition in the cohorts were identified.
DOI: 10.1186/s12874-020-01206-5
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/10216/149452
Source: BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Jan 12;21(1):19
Related Information: info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/733280/EU
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/6817 - DCRRNI ID/UIDB/04750/2020/PT
Document Type: Artigo em Revista Científica Internacional
Rights: openAccess
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Appears in Collections:ISPUP - Artigo em Revista Científica Internacional

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
marques-bmcmrm-2021.pdf606.32 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons