Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/10216/149452| Author(s): | Marques, SCS Doetsch, J Abate, G Brødsgaard, A Colombo, G Cuttini, M Pedersen, P Barros, H RECAP Preterm-WP6 QS Work Group |
| Title: | Understanding participation in European cohort studies of preterm children: the views of parents, healthcare professionals and researchers |
| Publisher: | BMC |
| Issue Date: | 2021 |
| Abstract: | Background Retention of participants in cohort studies is a major challenge. A better understanding of all elements involved in participation and attrition phenomena in particular settings is needed to develop effective retention strategies. The study aimed to achieve an in-depth understanding of participant retention in longitudinal cohorts focusing on participants’ and researcher’s perspectives, across three diverse socio-geographic and cultural settings. Methods This study used a triangulation of multi-situated methods to collect data on cohort studies of children born with less than 32 weeks of gestation in Denmark, Italy and Portugal. It included focus groups and individual semi-driven interviewing with involved key actors (i.e. parents, staff, healthcare professionals, researchers) and a collaborative visual methodology. A purposive sample of 48 key actors (n = 13 in Denmark; n = 13 in Italy; n = 22 in Portugal) was collected. A triangulation of phenomenological thematic analysis with discourse analysis was applied. Cross-contextual and context-specific situational elements involved in participation and attrition phenomena in these child cohorts were identified at various levels and stages. Results Main findings included: situational challenges affecting potential and range of possibilities for implementation strategies (geopolitical environment, societal changes, research funding models); situational elements related to particular strategies acting as deterrents (postal questionnaires) and facilitators (multiple flexible strategies, reminders, regular interaction); main motivations to enrol and participate (altruism/solidarity and gratitude/sense of duty to reciprocate); main motivational deterrents to participate to follow-up waves (lack of bonding, insufficient feedback); entanglement of clinical and research follow-up as facilitator and deterrent. Conclusions The multi-situated approach used, addressing the interplay of the lived experience of individuals, was of most value to understand participation variability under different implemented strategies in-context. Cross-contextual and context-specific situational elements that have been influential factors towards participation and attrition in the cohorts were identified. |
| DOI: | 10.1186/s12874-020-01206-5 |
| URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/10216/149452 |
| Source: | BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Jan 12;21(1):19 |
| Related Information: | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/733280/EU info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/6817 - DCRRNI ID/UIDB/04750/2020/PT |
| Document Type: | Artigo em Revista Científica Internacional |
| Rights: | openAccess |
| License: | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
| Appears in Collections: | ISPUP - Artigo em Revista Científica Internacional |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| marques-bmcmrm-2021.pdf | 606.32 kB | Adobe PDF | ![]() View/Open |
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
