Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10216/143221
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorMøller, P
dc.creatorMuruzabal, D
dc.creatorBakuradze, T
dc.creatorRichling, E
dc.creatorBankoglu, EE
dc.creatorStopper, H
dc.creatorLangie, SAS
dc.creatorAzqueta, A
dc.creatorJensen, A
dc.creatorScavone, F
dc.creatorGiovannelli, L
dc.creatorWojewódzka, M
dc.creatorKruszewski, M
dc.creatorValdiglesias, V
dc.creatorLaffon, B
dc.creatorCosta, C
dc.creatorCosta, S
dc.creatorTeixeira, JP
dc.creatorMarino, M
dc.creatorDel, Bo', C
dc.creatorRiso, P
dc.creatorShaposhnikov, S
dc.creatorCollins, A
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T14:45:47Z-
dc.date.available2022-08-23T14:45:47Z-
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn0267-8357
dc.identifier.issn1464-3804
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10216/143221-
dc.description.abstractThe comet assay is a popular assay in biomonitoring studies. DNA strand breaks (or unspecific DNA lesions) are measured using the standard comet assay. Oxidative stress-generated DNA lesions can be measured by employing DNA repair enzymes to recognise oxidatively damaged DNA. Unfortunately, there has been a tendency to fail to report results from assay controls (or maybe even not to employ assay controls). We believe this might have been due to uncertainty as to what really constitutes a positive control. It should go without saying that a biomonitoring study cannot have a positive control group as it is unethical to expose healthy humans to DNA damaging (and thus potentially carcinogenic) agents. However, it is possible to include assay controls in the analysis (here meant as a cryopreserved sample of cells i.e. included in each experiment as a reference sample). In the present report we tested potassium bromate (KBrO3) as a positive comet assay control for the formamidopyrimidine DNA glycosylase (Fpg)-modified comet assay. Ten laboratories used the same procedure for treatment of monocytic THP-1 cells with KBrO3 (0.5, 1.5 and 4.5 mM for 1 h at 37°C) and subsequent cryopreservation. Results from one laboratory were excluded in the statistical analysis because of technical issues in the Fpg-modified comet assay. All other laboratories found a concentration–response relationship in cryopreserved samples (regression coefficients from 0.80 to 0.98), although with different slopes ranging from 1.25 to 11.9 Fpg-sensitive sites (%DNA in tail) per 1 mM KBrO3. Our results demonstrate that KBrO3 is a suitable positive comet assay control.
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors thank the hCOMET project (COST Action, CA15132) for support. Carla Costa and Solange Costa were supported by grants FCT-SFRH/BPD/96196/2013 and SFRH/BPD/100948/2014, respectively.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherOxford University Press
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/POR_NORTE/SFRH/BPD/96196/2013/PT
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/POR_NORTE/SFRH/BPD/100948/2014/PT
dc.relation.ispartofMutagenesis. 2020 Sep 12;35(4):341-348
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titlePotassium bromate as positive assay control for the Fpg-modified comet assay
dc.typeArtigo em Revista Científica Internacional
dc.contributor.uportoInstituto de Saúde Pública da Universidade do Porto
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/mutage/geaa011
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://academic.oup.com/mutage/article/35/4/341/5823763#207362610
Appears in Collections:ISPUP - Artigo em Revista Científica Internacional

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
moller-m-2020.pdf383.45 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons