Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10216/126898
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorBruno Areias
dc.creatorSusana C. Caetano
dc.creatorLuísa Costa Sousa
dc.creatorMarco Paulo Parente
dc.creatorRenato Natal Jorge
dc.creatorHenrique Sousa
dc.creatorJoão Maia Gonçalves
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-11T03:29:48Z-
dc.date.available2022-09-11T03:29:48Z-
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn1025-5842
dc.identifier.othersigarra:392546
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10216/126898-
dc.description.abstractThe present study aims to compare spinal stability after two different minimally invasive techniques, the lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) and the transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) approaches. Two nonlinear three-dimensional finite element (FE) models of the L4-L5 functional spinal unit (FSU) were subjected to the loads that usually act on the lumbar spine. Findings show that the LLIF approach yields better results for torsion load case, due to the larger surface area of the implant. For extension, flexion and lateral bending loads, the TLIF approach presents smaller displacements probably due to the anterior placement of the cage and to the smaller damaged area of the annulus fibrosus.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsrestrictedAccess
dc.titleNumerical simulation of lateral and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, two minimally invasive surgical approaches
dc.typeArtigo em Revista Científica Internacional
dc.contributor.uportoFaculdade de Engenharia
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/10255842.2020.1734579
dc.identifier.authenticusP-00R-W5C
Appears in Collections:FEUP - Artigo em Revista Científica Internacional

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
392546.pdf
  Restricted Access
Full paper5.05 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.