Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10216/126474
Author(s): Vaughn, C
Costa, JL
Feilotter, H
Petraroli, R
Bagai, V
Rachiglio, A
Marino, F
Tops, B
Kurth, H
Sakai, K
Mafficini, A
Bastien, R
Reiman, A
Le Corre, D
Boag, A
Crocker, S
Bihl, M
Hirschmann, A
Scarpa, A
Machado, JC
Blons, H
Sheils, O
Bramlett, K
Ligtenberg, M
Cree, I
Normanno, N
Nishio, K
Laurent-Puig, P
Title: Simultaneous detection of lung fusions using a multiplex RT-PCR next generation sequencing-based approach: A multi-institutional research study
Publisher: BMC
Issue Date: 2018
Abstract: Background: Gene fusion events resulting from chromosomal rearrangements play an important role in initiation of lung adenocarcinoma. The recent association of four oncogenic driver genes, ALK, ROS1, RET, and NTRK1, as lung tumor predictive biomarkers has increased the need for development of up-to-date technologies for detection of these biomarkers in limited amounts of material. Methods: We describe here a multi-institutional study using the Ion AmpliSeq™ RNA Fusion Lung Cancer Research Panel to interrogate previously characterized lung tumor samples. Results: Reproducibility between laboratories using diluted fusion-positive cell lines was 100%. A cohort of lung clinical research samples from different origins (tissue biopsies, tissue resections, lymph nodes and pleural fluid samples) were used to evaluate the panel. We observed 97% concordance for ALK (28/30 positive; 71/70 negative samples), 95% for ROS1 (3/4 positive; 19/18 negative samples), and 93% for RET (2/1 positive; 13/14 negative samples) between the AmpliSeq assay and other methodologies. Conclusion: This methodology enables simultaneous detection of multiple ALK, ROS1, RET, and NTRK1 gene fusion transcripts in a single panel, enhanced by an integrated analysis solution. The assay performs well on limited amounts of input RNA (10ng) and offers an integrated single assay solution for detection of actionable fusions in lung adenocarcinoma, with potential savings in both cost and turn-around-time compared to the combination of all four assays by other methods.
DOI: 10.1186/s12885-018-4736-4
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/10216/126474
Source: BMC Cancer, vol.18(1):828
Document Type: Artigo em Revista Científica Internacional
Rights: openAccess
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
Appears in Collections:I3S - Artigo em Revista Científica Internacional

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
10.1186-s12885-018-4736-4.pdf588.68 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons