Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: https://hdl.handle.net/10216/114838
Registo completo
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.creatorYazdanpanah Y
dc.creatorPerelman J
dc.creatorDilorenzo MA
dc.creatorAlves J
dc.creatorBarros H
dc.creatorMateus C
dc.creatorPereira, J
dc.creatorMansinho, K
dc.creatorRonine, M
dc.creatorPark, JE
dc.creatorRoss, EL
dc.creatorLosina, E
dc.creatorWalensky, RP
dc.creatorNoubary, F
dc.creatorFreedberg, KA|Paltiel, AD
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-27T11:35:01Z-
dc.date.available2018-08-27T11:35:01Z-
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10216/114838-
dc.description.abstractObjective: To compare the clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of routine HIV screening in Portugal to the current practice of targeted and on-demand screening. Design: We used Portuguese national clinical and economic data to conduct a model-based assessment. Methods: We compared current HIV detection practices to strategies of increasingly frequent routine HIV screening in Portuguese adults aged 18-69. We considered several subpopulations and geographic regions with varying levels of undetected HIV prevalence and incidence. Baseline inputs for the national case included undiagnosed HIV prevalence 0.16%, annual incidence 0.03%, mean population age 43 years, mean CD4 count at care initiation 292 cells/μL, 63% HIV test acceptance, 78% linkage to care, and HIV rapid test cost €6 under the proposed routine screening program. Outcomes included quality-adjusted survival, secondary HIV transmission, cost, and incremental cost-effectiveness. Results: One-time national HIV screening increased HIV-infected survival from 164.09 quality-adjusted life months (QALMs) to 166.83 QALMs compared to current practice and had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of €28,000 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY). Screening more frequently in higher-risk groups was cost-effective: for example screening annually in men who have sex with men or screening every three years in regions with higher incidence and prevalence produced ICERs of €21,000/QALY and €34,000/QALY, respectively. Conclusions: One-time HIV screening in the Portuguese national population will increase survival and is cost-effective by international standards. More frequent screening in higher-risk regions and subpopulations is also justified. Given Portugal’s challenging economic priorities, we recommend prioritizing screening in higher-risk populations and geographic settings.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofPLoS One, vol. 8(12)
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.subjectHIV/AIDS - Screening - Portugal
dc.titleRoutine HIV Screening in Portugal: Clinical Impact and Cost-Effectiveness
dc.typeArtigo em Revista Científica Internacional
dc.contributor.uportoInstituto de Saúde Pública
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0084173
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0084173
Aparece nas coleções:ISPUP - Artigo em Revista Científica Internacional

Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro Descrição TamanhoFormato 
YazdanpanahY2013.pdf502.08 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
Ver/Abrir


Todos os registos no repositório estão protegidos por leis de copyright, com todos os direitos reservados.