Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10216/114740
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorBaia, I-
dc.creatorAmorim, M-
dc.creatorSilva, S-
dc.creatorKelly-Irving, M-
dc.creatorFreitas, C-
dc.creatorAlves, E-
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-27T11:34:54Z-
dc.date.available2018-08-27T11:34:54Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.issn0378-3782-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10216/114740-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Assessing parental stress during infants' hospitalization in Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICU) is essential to identify parents at risk for immediate and extended physical and emotional burden. AIMS: To identify sources of stress in mothers and fathers of very preterm infants hospitalized in NICU, and their association with sociodemographic, obstetric and infants' characteristics. STUDY DESIGN: Observational and cross-sectional study conducted between July 2013 and June 2014. SUBJECTS: Parents of very preterm infants hospitalized in all level III NICU in the Northern Health Region of Portugal were consecutively and systematically invited to participate in this study, being included 120 mothers and 91 fathers (participation rate: 96.8%). OUTCOME MEASURES: The Portuguese version of the Parental Stressor Scale: Neonatal Intensive Care Unit was used. RESULTS: The overall experience of hospitalization was classified as more stressful than the median for the subscales. "Change in parental role" was classified as the most stressful subscale by mothers (Median (P25-P75): 4.1(3.2-4.7)) and fathers (Median (P25-P75): 3.2(2.4-4.0)). Mothers scored significantly higher in all subscales. For mothers, multiple pregnancy was associated with lower levels of stress regarding "change in parental role" (β=-0.597; 95% CI=-1.020 to -0.174) and "overall stress" (β=-0.603; 95% CI=-1.052 to -0.153). Being ≥30years old was found to be a significant predictor for decreased fathers' stress. CONCLUSIONS: This study raises awareness for the need to develop sensitive instruments that take notice of gender, social support and family-centered care. The implementation of interventions focused on reducing parental stress is crucial to diminish disparities in family health.-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.relation.ispartofEarly Hum Dev, vol. 101, p. 3-9-
dc.rightsopenAccess-
dc.subjectVery preterm infants-
dc.subjectNeonatal Intensive Care Units-
dc.titleParenting very preterm infants and stress in Neonatal Intensive Care Units-
dc.typeArtigo em Revista Científica Internacional-
dc.contributor.uportoInstituto de Saúde Pública-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2016.04.001-
dc.description.version2018: The authors regret to inform that they detect minor errors on the manuscript and they would like to correct them, if possible. These alterations have no implications for the results interpretation or the discussion of the paper. The proportion of participation reported on Abstract (page 3) and on Methods section (page 4) should be 96.8% instead of 98.6%. On Table 1 (page 5) the proportion should be 68.3% instead of 69.3% regarding caesarean mode of delivery, among mothers. The p value 0.026 instead of 0.023 for the comparison of the scores of the subscale “change in parental role” according to multiple pregnancies on Results section (page 5) and on Table 3 (page 6). The p value should be 0.316 instead of 0.312 for the comparison of the scores of the subscale “sights and sounds” according to household monthly income on Table 3 (page 6). The p value should be 0.882 instead of 0.881 for the comparison of the scores of the subscale “baby looks and behaves” according to educational level on Table 3 (page 6). The p value should be 0.112 instead of 0.115 for the comparison of the scores of the subscale “change in parental roles” according to extremely low birth weight delivery on Table 3 (page 6). The p value should be 0.680 instead of 0.623 for the comparison of the scores of the subscale “overall stress” according to mode of delivery on Table 3 (page 6). In Table 4, the mean value for the subscale “overall stress” should be 3 and not 4 for both vaginal/instrumental and caesarean mode of delivery. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.-
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378378215300803?via%3Dihub-
Appears in Collections:ISPUP - Artigo em Revista Científica Internacional

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
BaiaIAmorimM2016.pdf255.84 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
baia-ehd-2018-corr.pdf84.71 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.