Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment versus total excision with primary closure for sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease in the pediatric population|
|Abstract:||Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Endoscopic Pilonidal Sinus Treatment (EPSiT) in the pediatric population and compare it with excision followed by primary closure (EPC) regarding intra- and postoperative outcomes. Methods: A retrospective analysis of all patients with chronic sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus submitted to EPSiT and EPC during a 12-month period in our institution was performed. Data concerning patients' demographics and surgical outcomes were collected and compared between the two groups. Results: We analyzed a total of 21 cases that underwent EPSiT and 63 cases of EPC, both groups with similar demographic characteristics. Operative time was similar for both groups (30 vs. 38 min; p > 0.05). No major intraoperative complications were reported. Wound infection rate was lower for EPSiT ((5.2% [n = 1] vs. 20.0% [n = 12]); p > 0.05). Healing time was similar for both groups (28 vs. 37.5 days). Recurrence occurred in 18,9% (n = 15), with 2 cases (10.5%) reported in the EPSiT group versus 13 (21.6%) in EPC. There were no differences between groups regarding postoperative complications, complete wound healing and recurrence rates or healing time (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Our results suggest that EPSiT is as viable as excision followed by primary closure in the management of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus in the pediatric population.|
|Subject:||Endoscopic Pilonidal Sinus Treatment|
|Source:||J Pediatr Surg|
|Document Type:||Artigo em Revista Científica Internacional|
|Appears in Collections:||ISPUP - Artigo em Revista Científica Internacional|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.