Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/10216/111591| Author(s): | Araújo, F Severo, M Alegrete, N Howe, LD Lucas, R |
| Title: | Defining patterns of Sagittal Standing Posture in girls and boys of school age |
| Publisher: | American Physical Therapy Association |
| Issue Date: | 2017 |
| Abstract: | Background: Sagittal postural patterns are associated with back pain in adolescents and adults. However, whether postural patterns are already observable during childhood is unknown. Such a finding would confirm childhood as a key period for posture differentiation and thus for chronic pain etiology. Objective: The aims of this study were to identify and describe postural patterns in girls and boys of school age. Design: This was a cross-sectional study. Methods: Eligible children were evaluated at age 7 in the population-based birth cohort Generation XXI in Portugal. Posture was assessed through right-side photographs during habitual standing with retroreflective markers placed on body landmarks. Postural patterns were defined from trunk, lumbar, and sway angles with model-based clusters, and associations with anthropometric measures were assessed by multinomial logistic regression. Results: Posture was evaluated in 1,147 girls and 1,266 boys. Three postural patterns were identified: sway (26.9%), flat (20.9%), and neutral to hyperlordotic (52.1%) in girls and sway to neutral (58.8%), flat (36.3%), and hyperlordotic (4.9%) in boys. In girls, a higher body mass index was associated with a sway pattern (versus a flat pattern: odds ratio = 1.21; 95% CI = 1.12, 1.29), whereas in boys, a higher body mass index was associated with a hyperlordotic pattern (versus a flat pattern: odds ratio = 1.30; 95% CI = 1.17, 1.44). Limitations: Photogrammetry as a noninvasive method for posture assessment may have introduced some postural misclassifications. Conclusions: Postural patterns in 7-year-old children were consistent with those previously found in adults, suggesting that childhood is a sensitive period for posture differentiation. Sagittal morphology differed between girls and boys, emphasizing sex-specific biomechanical loads during a habitual upright position even in prepubertal ages. |
| Subject: | Sagittal standing posture Sagittal posture |
| DOI: | 10.2522/ptj.20150712 |
| URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10216/111591 |
| Series: | Physical Therapy, vol. 97(2), p. 258-267 |
| Related Information: | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/5876-PPCDTI/83038/PT info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/SFRH/SFRH/BD/72723/2010/PT info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/5876-PPCDTI/125050/PT info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/SFRH/SFRH/BD/85398/2012/PT info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/SFRH/SFRH/BPD/88729/2012/PT |
| Document Type: | Artigo em Revista Científica Internacional |
| Rights: | openAccess |
| Appears in Collections: | ISPUP - Artigo em Revista Científica Internacional |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Araujo972.pdf | 802.45 kB | Adobe PDF | ![]() View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
