Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: https://hdl.handle.net/10216/105068
Registo completo
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.creatorH. Ribeiro
dc.creatorS. Ramos
dc.creatorV. Homem
dc.creatorL. Santos
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-10T23:05:19Z-
dc.date.available2022-09-10T23:05:19Z-
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.issn0045-6535
dc.identifier.othersigarra:198061
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10216/105068-
dc.description.abstractPersonal care products, an important class of emerging contaminants, have been frequently detected in different environmental matrices. Included in this category are synthetic musks compounds (SMCs) and UV-filters. Their occurrence in the coastal environment has been poorly studied. Therefore, this work aimed to verify whether five coastline plant species (Carpobrotus edulis, Cakile maritima, Medicago marina, Elymus farctus borealis-atlanticus and Euphorbia paralias) have the ability to accumulate 11 SMCs (cashmeran, celestolide, phantolide, galaxolide, tonalide, exaltolide, musk moskene, tibetene, ambrette, xylene and ketone) and 2 organic UVB filters (3-(40 -methylbenzylidene) camphor and octocrylene), functioning as biosamplers. To accomplish this task, a QuEChERS technique ("Quick, Easy, Cheap, Effective, Rugged, and Safe") was employed to extract the target compounds from the plant material collected in 15 beaches of Matosinhos and Vila Nova de Gaia (Portugal). The resulting extracts were analysed by gas chromatographyemass spectrometry. Limits of detection ranged from 0.02 ng g1 for celestolide and tonalide to 1.32 ng g1 for musk ambrette. The obtained recoveries were around 93% and relative standard deviation was generally less than 15%. SMCs were detected at levels ranging from 1.56 to 350 ng g1 dw and UV-filters from 2.9 to 264 ng g1 dw. Galaxolide and 3-(40 -methylbenzylidene) camphor were the synthetic musk and UV-filter detected in higher concentrations, respectively. Plants with higher water content accumulate better SMCs (hottentot-fig), while those with higher lipid content retain better the UV-filters (sea spurge).
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/Comissão de Coordenação e Desenvolvimento Regional do Norte/P2020|Norte2020-Projetos Integrados ICDT/NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000005/LEPABE-2-ECO-INNOVATION/LEPABE-2-ECO-INNOVATION
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT - Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia/Projetos Estratégicos/UID/EQU/00511/2013 - POCI-01-0145-FEDER-006939/Laboratório de Engenharia de Processos, Ambiente, Biotecnologia e Energia/LEPABE
dc.rightsrestrictedAccess
dc.titleCan coastline plant species be used as biosamplers of emerging contaminants? - UV-filters and synthetic musks as case studies
dc.typeArtigo em Revista Científica Internacional
dc.contributor.uportoFaculdade de Engenharia
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.06.084
dc.identifier.authenticusP-00M-X8G
Aparece nas coleções:FEUP - Artigo em Revista Científica Internacional

Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro Descrição TamanhoFormato 
198061.pdf
  Restricted Access
Artigo original publicado602.92 kBAdobe PDFVer/Abrir


Todos os registos no repositório estão protegidos por leis de copyright, com todos os direitos reservados.