Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorRodolfo Matos
dc.creatorArmando Jorge Sousa
dc.description.abstractPeer education and teamwork are looked upon as important educational tools due to the massificationof higher education programmes. As such, teams frequently produce several deliverables throughouta given course, and these should be properly organized and assessed.As the deliverables submission process often occur in large numbers, any attempt to manage theprocedure too tightly is bound to make the evaluators spend a lot of time just checking, controlling andcorrecting each individual submission; assessing these vast numbers of deliverables, is anotherproblem, which is simply too vast to tackle in this article. Nevertheless, we do use plagiarism detectiontools which offer invaluable information to evaluators. These mentioned tools are also used in anunsuspecting way: while allowing the students to submit the deliverables in a loose way, these toolscan be used to check, and control any wrongdoing with little effort.This article shows the details of the implementation and the lessons learned. The prototype was testedin a course which has roughly one thousand students enrolled in, and that had effectively produced acourse-portfolio of an organized set with all deliverables in an (almost totally) automated manner.
dc.relation.ispartofProceedings of INTED2015 Conference
dc.titleUsing plagiarism detection tools in order to control group work submissions in large courses
dc.typeArtigo em Livro de Atas de Conferência Internacional
dc.contributor.uportoFaculdade de Engenharia
Appears in Collections:FEUP - Artigo em Livro de Atas de Conferência Internacional
REIT - Artigo em Livro de Atas de Conferência Internacional

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
140828.pdf184.55 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons