Argumento(s) de projecto: possibilidade(s) de um atlas

Abstract

This dissertation had its origin on the unrest that has been growing around the consciousness of the end of this cycle, of learning the architecture's operative tools, based on principles, methodologies of a particular school. And so, it assumes itself as a step back, a distance, a transition to the next moment - the confrontation to the real conditions of making architecture. In this student-architect condition, this document symbolizes/configurates the (possible) search on the (re)foundation of my own sense of project, of an autonomy. Without dogmas or paradigms, we try to identify the fundamentals or arguments of the creation of (our/a) project. In the set of sections here gathered we try to give notice to the movements, incurses or approaches that have been carried out, both on the projects-of-architecture of the masters as well on our own essay circumstances - to recognize an inherited body with a future purpose, at the fair distance. Admitting the arbitrariness of the architectural form, that provides from the liberty associated to its creation, and the unrest that this consciousness generates against the infinite panorama of possibilities of giving a form to the form, we seek for instruments, strategies, procedures, anchors or valid arguments to the project - we look for our own law in that freedom. Recognizing the complementary sense of every construction, we project in the task of drawing the space of "we", the reason of (our own) architecture. In order to be timely to architecture and to be a participant in the right tone, we attribute the project a procedural sense (as a resilience to the method idea) and explore the look, distance and limit as a way of building that adequacy problem; of building a posture, a certain way to look and intersect the world, of (re)concile what, at the start, wasn't (re)conciable.